An Indian’s View of Indian Affairs: A Speech by Chief Joseph

Sunju Han History 152 account Analysis During the late nineteenth century, legion(predicate) changes have occurred during the Industrial Revolution. The living conditions in America were deteriorating for every last(predicate)one who wasnt in the hurrying social economic classes. galore(postnominal) a(prenominal) complaints were arising from the multitude. Of the population, devil primary memorandums have been observed to stockpile the point of views of particular groups they represent. one of these documents was from gaffer Joseph of the Nez Perce Indians, from the Indian point of view. The separate document was from the populists Party, largely representing the farmers and working classes of the 1890s.The time percentage point of both documents roughly range from the 1870s through with(predicate) the 1890s. Chief Josephs speech was c wholeed An Indians View of Indian personal business. In his speech, he speaks from the Indians perspective of how they argon treated and handled. One of the many issues he brings up is more(prenominal) or less the treatment of his plurality. He felt that his mint are treated resembling animals and outlaws, be shot down or operate from dry land to country. The vacuouss who have encroached on their get to have driven disregardcelled their cows and horses. They overly stole from the Indians. For example, whites would brand the Indians young cattle so that they can claim it as their own.Chief Joseph in addition felt the whites were make problems on answer in found to start a war between the whites and Indians. He pleads his slip of paper by stating how the Indians didnt kill off the foremost white inuredtlers that were having trouble surviving. at once they repay their thanks by causing trouble because they have the power to bastinado the Indians. In the beginning, the Indians gave up some of their play foolishly view they would be left-hand(a) alone but the more they gave, the more that was taken from them. He complains that his battalion arent getting treated like humans. Many whites saw them as savages that dont know any differentwise port than violence.In his speech he is taking an randy approach in order to shape up the sympathy of law enforcers, Congress or the President, or from the population. As Chief Joseph was stating how his people were treated, he also stated a world(a) outline of the future he figure for his people. The future he envisioned consisted mainly of matchity. He dreams of his people be treated like in all the other men from the states. He pleads that ein truthbody follows the kindred dance band of legislation in the land that they all share. He believes that anyone born(p) of the earth was born a free man and should be given liberty.He wants his men to have an equal chance at life in habitual. The simple liberties like freedom to travel, work, handicraft where ever they choose, choice of teacher, or point following the religion of their fore fathers. The staple liberties stated in the very nucleotide of our country are what Chief Joseph is advocating for his people. He states that they will follow whatever laws set before them if they can get a chance of being treated like a real man in this country. Joseph did indeed believe that Native Americans and whites could coexist in the linked States.When the rootage white settlers appeared, he believed that they would all have the same set of morals and values. This was the basis of his principle in the coexistence of Indians and whites. His speech also depicts the very possibility of coexistence in exchange for equality. He believes that the Indians would have no problem or reason to cause conflict or trouble if these basic requests were met. He also believes that any man born in the same earth are all granted equal ripes from the moment they were born. He states that he is simply reclaiming those rights in order to help bump the living conditions his peo ple are living in.He also believes that some(prenominal) of the bloodshed and war can be avoided if each company can be more honest with each other and compromise. The Populists were the first policy-making insurgency, meaning that they were the first to radically go against the ideas of our nations political policies. They were the first political party that appealed to the farmers and the producing class, which included the industrial workers to the miners. They were the first party to bring up any political platform on issues that were for the general working class. Many of the other political parties would try to scotch up the many problems present in our economy.They were the radicals that went against all the other political platforms, bring up issues that the unsound companies and industries try to overlook or cover up. The Populists believed that he nation found itself on the brink of moral, political, and material slander. During those generation corruption, bribery, and despotism was uncontrolled everywhere near the whole world, not just the United States. The newspapers were bribed to be silenced, the public opinion didnt matter anymore, and there was corruption in the ballot boxes. The proletariaters were denied the freedom to form unions anymore. The cash flow was restricted by the mega-millionaires.There was no way of controlling the huge businesses to better the lives of the working class. These were some of the main issues that caused the Populists to believe that we were on the brink of moral, political, and material ruin. The two proposals put forth by the Populist Party that were significant were the right to form labor unions and the ownership of all transportation to the government. The right to form labor unions would become a sort of balancing process for the big companies. It would restrain the rampant companies from making their workers suffer from unfair and unsporting working conditions.It would also provide a system of c ontrol that the large industries didnt have before. The ownership of the railroads, telegraph, telephone, and post- office systems would establish a universal fairness for the masses. Since it is a crucial public necessity, a monopoly on any of these items could impact the whole country greatly. The government ownership of these systems would be for the general welfare of the people and create fees that can be affordable to the general masses and population throughout the United States. These are some of the issues and solutions stated in both Chief Josephs speech and the Populist platform.